My father often speaks about the one-room school he attended. Dad
took me to where the Stafford School once stood; now just the stairs
remain. I could picture the building sitting at its odd angle from the
road on the flat top of a rise. The trees and undergrowth disappeared
and the white schoolhouse came to life; children were playing red rover
and relaxing in the grass, enjoying their break from the reader and
slate.
Sitting on those abandoned stairs Dad told me
about inkwells, and the old recess bell. The boys in the school had to
cut wood and keep the fire going in winter. The students walked to
school or enjoyed the luxury of a horse drawn "bus." Spring "vacation"
was the time for planting; when they were done in the fields, while the
seeds were sprouting and needed little attention, they would finish out
school year for the summer. Not that many years ago but it seems like
another world when I compare it to school as I knew it at the K-12
level.
"Big, better, best" is the mentality that
governed the world and influenced schools during the mid-1980 through
the 1990’s. We always knew that we were supposed to be competing as
though our lives depended on it. The tests we took seemed to be a big
part of this competition. Everyone in my generation has filled in enough
little circles and ovals for ten lifetimes. I can’t say I ever
understood what we were supposed to be working so hard for or what those
tests really meant. When I scored a 12.5 grade equivalency did that
mean that I should already be done with school? There was possibly a
mention of the Japanese and occasionally we were informed of the Chinese
doppelganger who was preparing to come to the United States to take our
rightful place in the world.
So when Dad talked about
school as a place where you weren’t constantly on the offense in some
imaginary war, I was intrigued. Dad explained how the older children
helped the younger children. Yes, Johnny was a little "slow" but they
all pitched in to help him understand. My Dad’s eyes twinkled as he told
the stories, a few happy memories from an otherwise difficult and hard
childhood. I could only imagine being able to work with my classmates in
an environment that was anything other than competitive.
Teaching
at the high school level, there is no way to avoid the consequences of
this misguided practice. Students enter my classroom having been
thoroughly measured, weighed, and labeled. The "C" student expects to
get an average grade and he resents having to work very hard for it;
oddly enough the "A" student has the same attitude. The "F" student has
already decided that he is a "loser for life." When he does show up you
have no idea what to do with him.
At some point,
students quit competing. This is where the competition, reward,
punishment system breaks down. They no longer run the race; it takes
less effort to just let the long established order stand. The kids take
to heart the messages about individuality that are so common today.
However, they see a prescribed intellectual level as part of that
individuality. "I’m just stupid. Why should I try?" "I’m a straight A
student. Don’t ruin my record with a B!"
We might call
this particular phenomenon "apathy." Some might add this to the list of
examples of "irresponsible" behavior that today’s adolescents
demonstrate. The children we are talking about are apathetic about the
world and do not take responsibility for their role in the world; this
expectation of mediocrity hurts students at all levels. Undeserved
contentment has been incorporated into the collective self-concept (to
adapt a term from David Sousa). Wiggins and McTighe summarize the
problem well: "many students come to school somewhat unwilling (and not
expecting) to work very hard" (118). The causes and effects of this
attitude are just as important to be aware of as the possible solutions.
Like many of the problems the world faces today, there is no single
cause, effect, or solution.
A complete list of all of
the causes of student apathy would be impossible to compile. It is
possible, however, to briefly explore some of the most relevant and most
immediate of those causes. It is also important to remember that we
exist in a hierarchical world. We are world citizens, citizens of a
country, members of a community, part of a family unit, and individuals;
we are either trying to balance our obligations to these various groups
or being influence by them consciously or unconsciously. American
culture, for example is a powerful influence on all of our lives.
Contemporary American culture is affected by many different inputs. As I
present these issues and concerns remember that these are all
generalizations; there are many parents, schools, and students that do
not, thankfully, fit into these descriptions. However, for me, I need to
have some understanding of where these problems start from before I can
make the connections between appropriate actions and desired outcomes.
One of the most troubling and pervasive concerns is that of the
psychological health of our society.
Fear is now used
by many facets of our culture. News media keeps us afraid of everything
from killer bees to the ever-present anonymous, black, male, perpetrator
(
Bowling…). The current administration keeps us in a state of
constant paranoia because of the "potential" for terrorist attacks;
changes in the color-coded terror alert levels are almost daily
occurrences. Popular media feeds us a constant diet of "beauty" as they
define it; so, we are afraid that we will not measure up and therefore
lose out. Large corporations convince us that we need the latest
fashion, the latest prescription, and the latest gadget or we will fall
behind the rest of the pack.
Students experience these
same pressures and are ultimately more vulnerable to them. David Sousa
gives us the key to understanding the impact this has: "before students
will turn their attention to cognitive learning (the curriculum), they
must feel physically safe and emotionally secure" (43). Sousa is not
making a generalization based on observation or hyperbole. Studies of
the brain’s ability to process data under various circumstances have
proven that emotionally or physically stressful situations greatly
reduce the brain’s ability to learn. Anyone even paying half attention
to the media would find it difficult to have a mind functioning at its
best. Sousa also points out (citing a study by Sowell, et al.) that
students are particularly affected by emotional states because they do
not have a fully developed ability to regulate emotion (20). This
emotional interference with cognitive function is not a phenomenon
limited to students.
Teachers come to school after
watching the same morning news. For example, anyone who witnessed the
media’s handling of the attack at Columbine High School certainly has
been deeply and permanently affected. In the narration of his
documentary Michael Moore reminds us of this day and also touches on the
emotions teenagers deal with on a daily basis. "I guess we’ll never
know why they did it. But one thing adults should never forget, it still
sucks being a teenager and it really sucks going to school" (
Bowling…).
Many teachers’ attitudes about school after that day quickly became
just as grim. An unidentified school official sums up that attitude
best, "There’re little time bombs out there ticking, waiting to go off,
and there are many of them in every community" (
Bowling…).
Certainly, today we have gotten past some of these feelings. But we will
never get rid of them entirely. This event and the way the media
handled it has reinforced the us-versus-them (teachers versus students)
mentality that probably goes back to when the first school bell rang.
One of the earliest expressions of this idea in the popular media was
the film
Blackboard Jungle (1955).
Maintaining a
state of constant fear is possible cause of the American tendency to
quantify quality of life and measure success externally. During and
after times of extreme stress it is not uncommon for people to focus on
acquiring both the necessities and comforts of life; think about the
food hoarding that occurred after World War II. Now these attitudes and
actions are pervasive and constant. Americans "pursue human salvation
through science and technology. We find redemption through consumerism,
through things that are wondrous, useful, ingenious, and economically
profitable, but which do nothing to satisfy the needs of the inner life"
(Lear). Not only is it taboo in many settings to discuss our feelings,
emotions, beliefs, and spirit life, it is also very difficult to get
students to participate in such discussions.
I
have a deep concern about an unhealthy reticence—in our culture
generally, and in education in particular—to discuss what may be our
most distinctive trait—our mysterious inner life, and the fertile,
invisible realm that is the wellspring for the creativity and morality
of our species. It is that portion of ourselves that impels us to create
art and literature, and study ethics, philosophy, and history…This is
the spiritual life of our species. (Lear)
If we really want to affect
the thinking process and long term learning of our students, we need to
have access to the internal world of our students. As Lear points out,
it is the spirit that gives us "our sense of awe and wonder and longing
for truth beauty and a higher order of meaning." This is especially true
since we now know that the emotional system plays such an important
part in long-term remembering (Sousa 19). The difficulty in cracking
into this repository of the spirit is caused by some deeply rooted
cultural beliefs.
So many students come to school with
very few tools for managing and understanding their emotions, fears, and
beliefs. Teachers can be part of the solution.
Human
problems, especially those of children and adolescents, are best dealt
with through intense and continuous one-on-one communication and through
healthy interactions that enable adults to become positive role models
and guides. (Martin-Kniep 7)
I envision this process
being a natural part of the classroom activities; journaling and class
discussion for example can be valuable diagnostic tools for other skills
in they classroom as well as key tools for encouraging student
exploration of what they really believe and feel. Of course, the only
way students will share these discoveries and learn from them is if you
can maintain a safe environment for this type of exploration;
establishing this open communication is often very difficult with
students who already have their defenses in place at school.
The
second aspect of American culture that causes increased concerns for
schools is a disvaluing of discipline and dedication. "Much of American
society glamorizes easy success and the fast life. This cultural fashion
has reached such a dangerous point that American children readily
challenge authority and disdain intellectual development and
achievement" (Hwang 486). Many students have little ability to look into
the future, see a goal, and plan appropriate steps for getting there.
If the reward is not immediate, it is not real. Far from simply
repeating a complaint all too often stated, bringing up this behavior
ties together the above ideas. If we are afraid there won’t be a
tomorrow, why should we plan for it? Moreover, the lack of ability and
opportunity to communicate with adults about feelings and beliefs tells
students that those aspects of their person are unimportant.
Lack
of discipline and emotional pressure also relate to students’
unrealistic attitudes about cheating. Howard Gardner found that 75% of
students admitted to cheating at least once on a test while 84% agree
that cheating harms a person’s character (Bracey 412). The obvious
question then is if they believe it to be harmful why do they do it?
Some of this discrepancy might be explained by the responses Gardner
received when he interviewed students for this study on cheating. He
heard many of them say, "When I get to be famous, I’ll set a wonderful
moral example. But for now reality precludes that" (Bracey 412). I have
seen many students buy into this "fame" myth. The culture around
students shows them that the only people who have any impact on the
world are people who have gained a certain amount of fame. A gruesome
example of this is the death of Princess Diana. The whole world wept and
rightfully so; she was a very good person who tried to do many good
things. However, we barely even pause when a "normal" person is killed
in a drunk driving incident. Death and effort only count when they are
backed by fame.
Current brain research provides
another possible explanation for our current obsession with short term
rewards. Sousa discusses the brain’s preexisting preference for novelty.
The brain filters information by its uniqueness and potential impact on
the person. In everyday life this affects everything from learning
styles to safely driving a car. This pursuit of unique and memorable
experiences can also be a detriment:
Some
adolescents who perceive little novelty in their environment may turn
to mind-altering drugs, such as ecstasy and amphetamines for
stimulation. This drug dependence can further enhance the brain’s demand
for novelty to the point that it becomes unbalanced and resorts to
extremes-oriented behavior. (Sousa 29 citing Laviola et al.)
Certainly it is easy to see
how students with drug addictions and who use mind altering drugs are
affected in a school setting. This phenomenon also has an impact on
students without drug problems. When novelty seeking and our current
culture (which is essentially a novelty buffet) get together, schools
suffer. In the past "there were few other distractions, school was an
important influence in a child’s life and the primary source of
information" (Sousa 28). This is of course not true anymore. So teachers
need to consciously work to increase the amount of novel experiences
for students.
All of these factors become condensed
when we focus on families and schools. Family is the first group most
people belong to. These early experiences with attitudes, emotions, and
learning affect children for a lifetime. Today we have a wonderfully
diverse collection of family types and constructions. Many point to this
diversity as a source of problems. However, I don’t believe that anyone
type of family structure holds any intrinsic superiority. Both the
benefits and problems of the family are universal.
One
of the major issues with families today is that the adults in the family
who traditionally supported children in their growth and learning no
longer take as active of a role. Educational systems were founded on the
belief that "parents are an extension of the school and vice versa.
This is not a valid assumption in modern day America." (Hwang 487). For
various reasons parents no longer have the same impact on their
children’s lives. "Parents are so busy divorcing, working ,feeding their
own addictions, and searching for personal fulfillment that there is no
time left to make children’s education priority" (Hwang 487). This lack
of support for children is particularly troubling when it is taken to
the extreme. After giving an assignment to a college prep writing class,
I had an 11
th grade student come to me and say, "Mr. Lentz I
don’t know when I’ll get this assignment done. I had to move out of my
mom’s home because her new boyfriend wouldn’t leave me alone. Mom chose
him over me. I’m on my own now." I almost called it quits right there; I
said to myself, "That’s it, no more teaching; I can’t afford the
emotional turmoil." I couldn’t fathom how I could compete with such a
trying emotional situation. I am happy to say that I didn’t give up. And
that particular student wound up growing in her writing ability. I
encouraged the students to write about their real lives. She took that
opportunity. But not all students take those opportunities to grow and
heal when presented.
When things go wrong and a student
fails we sometimes see another particularly troubling aspect of the
modern family. Parents who have not taken responsibility or given their
children the guidance to be responsible look for someone to blame. Yong
Hwan summarizes the situation very well; he says that American parents:
have
invented a very peculiar form of logic in dealing with low student
achievement. If a child fails, society is at fault, poverty is at fault,
teachers are at fault. Everybody responsible except the student who
failed and parents themselves who failed to motivate the learner. It is
the age of the all purpose victim: the individual or group whose plight,
condition or even academic achievement is not a matter that needs to be
solved by individual effort but constitutes a social problem in itself.
(488)Certainly there are
many cases where "individual effort" is not enough to solve the problem.
It is, however, a very common attitude among students that the teacher
and the school are supposed to "make" them learn. This is related to the
incorrect thinking of students who ask, "What grade are you going to
give me?" When you reply with, "The grade that you earn," they become
confused and defiant. Their attitude suggests (and sometimes they even
say): "I cannot earn anything; this means I will fail."
The
structure and methods in many schools and classrooms certainly affect
students in a negative way as well. First and foremost is the continued
and increasing focus on norm referenced testing. It is easy to see that
"the school’s evaluation system is more brutal than the real world. Few
in the work force are subjected to the humiliation of norm-referenced
evaluation" (Raffini 54). One of the problems with this system is that
it expects everyone to fit within a particular pattern of expected
ability. It makes no difference how skilled or knowledgeable a
particular student is. "We often assume that only the dull, lazy, or
unambitious are below average, in reality, it’s a fixed percentage of
the population – regardless of achievement" (Raffini 53). This test
produces statistical data that reports on a very narrow spectrum of
ability and is then used to determine the experience all students have
with school. Students "quickly discover that they must compete with each
other for a limited number of rewards. During this competition, the
system teaches students that effort is less important than ability"
(Raffini 54). This relates back to my experience of school, competition
for limited rewards with no real reason given for the competition.
The
culture that this form of competition creates in schools is counter to
all of the things we know about how the brain works best. As noted
earlier, Sousa cautions that long-term memory is dependent on stress
level. James Raffini points out that many students might simply be
unwilling to accept mediocrity (53). Self protection and preservation
are important traits. Richard Stiggins summarizes how this mechanism
works:
Psychologists who study
motivation tell us that students can fall into a classification that
they call "failure acceptors" (Covington, 1992). Typically, these
students have experienced sufficient failure in the classroom to infer
either that they are too dumb to get it or that getting it is just not
worth the effort. They took the risk of trying to learn early in their
academic lives, did not succeed, were punished for it, lost confidence,
and do not want to risk such pain again. (210)
I believe that as teachers
we have all encountered greatly gifted students who this applies to. As
an English teacher, I get more than my share of these students. When
students have early encounters with English classes and find out that
they are about memorizing grammar rules, and relearning (in more
abstract ways) things that they already know instinctively, they are
turned off to the subject.
I had a student taking an
after school credit recovery class because she had failed an English
class. It was evident to me that she was motivated, skilled, determined,
and creative. I couldn’t fathom why she hadn’t passed the class she had
been in (which is taught by one of the best teachers I know). Through
conversations with this student I found out that her grade was an F for
that class because she could not complete journal entries. Some
encounter with that activity in her past prevented her from finishing
the task.
Another common practice in schools that
causes problems for students is the insistence upon rote learning. "When
faced with constant repetition, we become bored—and we become
unmotivated" (Silver 45). We all know this to be true. Yet, when we are
in front of the class it is difficult to keep from exposing students to
the same torturous situations we experienced as students. "Schoolwork is
often needlessly boring, especially when composed of mind-numbing skill
worksheets or excessive passive listening – all of it divorced from
interesting problems and realistic performance challenges" (Wiggins
119). Silver, Wiggins, Sousa and many others all recognize the impact of
this type of learning. Gardner even suggests that boring learning
activities and pressure to succeed are the primary causes of cheating
(Bracey 412). If along the way I hadn’t had a teacher show me that
English was something other than grammar and spelling, I would never
have become an English teacher. I wouldn’t have been interested enough
or believed that I had the skills to do the job.
All of
these problems suggest some very direct solutions. My methods,
attitudes, and practices can be altered in order to reach more students.
One of the first changes I can work toward is becoming aware of each
student as a whole person. I have always been aware of the power of this
concept. I did not, however, have a real grasp of how to conceptualize
the impact of this on my classroom. Students thrive when they are under
self imposed desires to succeed (good stress, a.k.a. "level of concern")
(Sousa 67). Especially when they are working on something that
challenges them at an appropriate level. Here I can look to popular
media for some ideas. Video games are addictive and allow for a learning
experience because they challenge players at their individual ability
level. "Cognitive psychologists call this the ‘regime of competence’
principle…As players progress, puzzles become more complex, enemies
swifter and more numerous, underlying patterns more subtle" (Johnson
40). This is an idea that was repeated in many different texts. Wiggins
and McTighe write about "designing learning that confronts students with
the limits of their ideas and the promise of new ones" (Wiggins 175).
If you can challenge students within a familiar framework and in close
proximity to their existing abilities, you increase the likelihood of
student learning. In the classroom this concept can be employed many
ways. One example would be giving the students writing assignments that
are within in their current comfort level and then continuously pushing
them to take one step at a time closer to utilizing all of the concepts
of good writing. If the students are allowed to write about topics that
they really care about, the likelihood of interest and success is
increased as well.
Much of what I have been learning
this summer about assessment and instruction relates to this concept as
well. "By reinforcing a student’s understanding of what she knows and
can do, it can motivate her to change and to replace vague hope with
realistic goal setting" (Schmitz 21). But this is about more than simply
looking at skill level. Students are also predisposed to various ways
of exploring the world and various ways of being part of the world.
Teachers
need to create a classroom environment that allows students to process
information the way they do in the world outside of school. Outside
school, children tend to rely on their natural ways of learning. In
school, however, we often ask students to process in only one or two
ways. (Silver 47) So I need
to be more aware of both what I ask students to do and the ways I allow
them to explore the material and demonstrate understanding.
A
particularly important aspect of student ability is the rate at which
students process information. Sousa discusses this problem and suggests a
simple solution; set curricular priorities in order to allow students
to have the necessary time to achieve the upper levels of Bloom’s
Taxonomy (262). Certainly this creates problems when you are required
cover certain material over the course of a class; the reality is (as
several of the resources note), however, that covering the material does
not mean learning is occurring. We need to decide if covering all of
the material or promoting true learning (complex understanding that
allows transfer) is more important. One of the techniques I can use is
essential questions. As noted in several texts this gives the teachers
and students a way to prioritize and focus instruction.
The
unrealistic goal of plowing through the text book in the class time
allowed negatively affects the amount of effort students are willing to
put into learning. Several of the texts point out that instead of
focusing on text book ordered learning it is beneficial to have a
standard that relates to the subject as it is used in the professional
world. "Only when grades are based on standards of absolute performance
of clearly stated objectives, and differences in student ability are
viewed primarily as differences in the amount of time students require
to master these objectives, will it be possible for effort to result in
success" (Raffini 55). This of course touches on another major area of
improvement I can make. Basing my judgments of performance on clearly
articulated and public criteria drawn from standards is a major way I
can improve student motivation, demonstrate accountability, and provide a
more focused and effective curriculum (noted in several resources).
One
final area for me to address as a teacher is emotional impact. I’ve
noted how Sousa describes the impact of emotions on learning. He
indicates that "teachers should strive to bond positive feelings to new
learnings so that students feel competent and can enjoy the process"
(Sousa 145). At this point I feel that many of my lessons were not
negative in the emotional realm. Mostly they were neutral. This created
no benefit for the students and it made the daily classroom experience
rather dull as well. I care about what I’m doing so it should be well
within reason to invest some emotional energy into it. Emphasizing the
positive aspects of a performance or product, and presenting improvement
suggestions with a "soft" touch and with a focus on real world reasons
for the suggestion should be a priority.
I have always
tried to encourage student interest, motivation, and growth. I believed
that this was the best source for positive feelings about a class. Of
course, this was often unsuccessful. I now understand that students
approach an activity and quickly decide if it is something they should
be concerned about. "Self-motivation on the part of students can be
expected only if students have opportunities to focus on topics and
activities that interest them" (Silver 45). Wiggins and McTighe repeat
the sentiment more succinctly. The "work must be purposeful from the
student’s
point of view" (Wiggins 117). The goal of emotional impact, student
interest, and real-life relevance can be addressed in one concept, the
human spirit. "Preparing the next generation for the world we live in
means teaching it to look deeper into itself, to that place where
humans, from the beginning of time, have shared the same sense of awe
and wonder as they groped for meaning" (Lear). Too often we run rampant
with our ability to analyze. We need to maintain our ability (and
recognize the necessity) of stepping back and taking a look at the whole
student. A very important part of that "whole" cannot be easily
separated out from the whole. Classroom activities should provide
outlets for spiritual/creative/emotional ideas and opportunities for
exploration of this realm.
Of course there are many
other changes I want to make. For example, I want to work on
incorporating more appropriate humor (Sousa 63). In general, I want to
improve my attitudes about school and students. In the past, the
individual failures became a greater focus than multiple successes.
There is potential in all students. I can do many things to encourage
that potential and give students a reason to care. But I cannot make it
happen for them. I can and should show them the possibility of success,
provide the tools, give encouragement, and then let them decide for
themselves. They need to see the wisdom of making good choices because
they will never completely believe it if they only have my word to go
on. If I have done my best to help and encourage the students I
encounter, I should be able to accept that many students will not learn
about the hardships I am warning them about unless they experience them
for themselves. I found a helpful little list of reminders that I plan
to hold onto for a long time. The following presents nine ways to deal
with unresponsive students. It was printed in a Salt Lake City School
District newsletter:
1. Avoid
taking it personally. The problem has to do with the student, not you.
2. Avoid getting angry. It’s sad when a student doesn’t care. The
student needs kindness and understanding, not hostility.
3. Try to determine if the indifference is only school-related.
Perhaps there are problems outside of school.
4. Tell the student you’re not going to give up on her--even if
she has given up on herself. Refuse to accept the student’s rejection of
your efforts.
5. Avoid embarrassing the student. When he doesn’t respond to a
question, provide some answers to choose from.
6. Give the student lots of opportunities for involvement.
7. Search for areas and activities that will interest her.
8. Minimize the chances for failure. Shorten assignments. Make
the goal of each assignment clearer and more immediately achievable.
9. Notice and reward changes in behavior.
Some days the only thing
you can do is accept the reality around you and plan for the time you
have the opportunity to change that reality.
Compared
to the world my father lived in with the one-room schoolhouse, students
today live in a very artificial world. "Reality" is something a child is
rarely exposed to until he is on his own. Like the school building that
is no longer there, kids are shown the steps but they never see the
purpose for climbing them. My job is to show them, tell them, and let
them create their own world on top of those stairs.
Works Cited
Bowling
for Columbine, Special Edition. DVD. Dir. Michael Moore.
documentary. United Artists and Alliance Atlantis, 2002.
Bracey,
Gerald W. "A Nation of Cheats."
Phi Delta Kappan. Jan. 2005:
412-413.
EBSCO Host. Kilbourn Library, Wisconsin Dells, WI. 31
July 2005.
http://www.ebscohost.com.
Hwang,
Yong G. "Student Apathy, Lack of Self-Responsibility and False
Self-Esteem are Failing American Schools."
Education 115.4
(1995): 484-490.
EBSCO Host. Kilbourn Library, Wisconsin Dells,
WI. 31 July 2005.
.
Johnson, Steven.
"Your Brain on Video Games: Could They Actually be Good for You?"
Discover
26.7 (2005): 38-43.
Lear, Norman. "Education for the
Human Spirit."
Education Digest March 56.7 (1991): 33-35.
EBSCO
Host. Kilbourn Library, Wisconsin Dells, WI. 26 July 2005.
.
Martin-Kniep,
Aiselle O.
Becoming a Better Teacher: Eight Innovations That Work.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,
2000.
"Nine Responses to Unresponsive Students."
Curriculum
Review 40.3 (2000): 6.
EBSCO Host. Kilbourn Library,
Wisconsin Dells, WI. 31 July 2005.
.
Raffini,
James P. "Student Apathy: A Motivational Dilemma."
Educational
Leadership 44.1 (1986): 53-55.
EBSCO Host. Kilbourn Library,
Wisconsin Dells, WI. 31 July 2005.
.
Schmitz,
Jo Ann ed. and Alverno College Faculty.
Student
Assessment-as-Learning at Alverno College. Milwaukee: Alverno
College, 1994.
Silver, Harvey F., Richard W. Strong,
Matthew J. Perini.
So Each May Learn: Integrating Learning Styles and
Multiple Intelligences. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development, 2000.
Sousa, David A.
How
the Brain Learns, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press,
2001.
Stiggins, Richard J.
Student-Involved
Assessment FOR Learning. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Merrill Prentice
Hall, 2005.
Wiggins, Grant and McTighe, Jay.
Understanding
by Design. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall, 1998.
Writing
Study Group of the NCTE of the Executive Committee. "NCTE Beliefs About
the Teaching of Writing." Nov. 2004. National Council of Teachers of
English. 8 July 2005
.
Resources
(Not Cited)
Brown, Waln K. "Turning Your Life Around:
Tips From an Ex-Juvenile Delinquent."
Reclaiming Children and Youth
13.4 (2005): 218-223.
EBSCO Host. Kilbourn Library, Wisconsin
Dells, WI. 8 July 2005.
.
Hassel, Holly
and Lourey, Jessica. "The Dea(r)th of Student Responsibility." College
Teaching 53.1 (2005): 2-12.
EBSCO Host. Kilbourn Library,
Wisconsin Dells, WI. 8 July 2005.
http://www.ebscohost.com.
The
National Commission on Writing.
Writing: A Powerful Message From
State Government. College Board, 2005.
Schmitz, Jo
Ann ed. and Alverno College Faculty.
Student Assessment-as-Learning
at Alverno College. Milwaukee: Alverno College, 1994.
Shepard,
Lorrie A. "The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture."
Educational
Researcher 29.7 (2000): 4-14.
Townsend, Jane S.
"Silent Voices: What Happens to Quiet Students During Classroom
Discussions?"
English Journal Feb. 1998: 72-80.
Wolf,
Dennie, Janet Bixby, John Glenn III, Howard Gardner. "Chapter 2: To Use
Their Minds Well: Investigation New Forms of Student Assessment."
Review
of Research in Education, 17. Ed. Gerald Grant. Washington, DC: The
American Educational Research Association, 1991. 31-74.
Writing Study Group of the NCTE of the Executive Committee. "NCTE
Beliefs About the Teaching of Writing." Nov. 2004. National Council of
Teachers of English. 8 July 2005
http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/write/118876.htm.